Asked by ehyoung
The food price index for meats, poultry, fish, and eggs has reached an all-time high in May, according to data from theBureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).
In January 1967, when the BLS started tracking this measure, the index for meats, poultry, fish, and eggs was 38.1.
In May 2014, the index for meats, poultry, fish, and eggs was 252.832, the highest level it has been since BLS started tracking these data.
One year ago from today in May 2013, the index was 234.572, meaning that the index has increased 7.78% in one year.
“The index for meats, poultry, fish and eggs has risen 7.7 percent over the span [last year],” says the BLS. “The index for food at home increased 0.7 percent, its largest increase since July 2011. Five of the six major grocery store food group indexes increased in May. The index for meats, poultry, fish, and eggs rose 1.4 percent in May after a 1.5 increase in April, with virtually all its major components increasing,” BLS states.
In addition to this food index, the price for fresh whole chickens hit its all-time high in the United States in May.
In January 1980, when the BLS started tracking the price of this commodity, fresh whole chickens cost $0.70 per pound. By this May 2014, fresh whole chickens cost $1.56 per pound.
A decade ago, in May 2004, a pound of fresh chicken cost $1.04. Since then, the price has gone up 50%.
All the important things in my life cost too much…
END THE FED! IT IS NOT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, IT IS RICH PEOPLE GETTING RICHER OFF THE BACKS OF THE TAXPAYERS!! THERE IS NO NEED FOR THIS UNFEDERAL BUSINESS!!
If the rich are getting richer off the taxpayers, then obviously the federal government is involved. The last time I checked, I don’t pay taxes to Bill Gates, George Soros, and Warren Buffett.
How about posting some truth attached to this lame straw man argument?
Most minimum-wage workers are not poor. Congress should examine which workers—that would not lose their jobs—would benefit from a higher minimum wage.
Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Census Bureau show that most minimum-wage earners are young, part-time workers and that relatively few of them live below the poverty line. Their average family income is over $53,000 a year. A hike in the minimum wage primarily raises pay for suburban teenagers, not the working poor. If Congress and the President seriously want to help the working poor, they should look elsewhere.
Relatively few Americans earn the federal minimum wage. In 2011 and 2012, 3.7 million Americans reported earning $7.25 or less per hour—just 2.9 percent of all workers in the United States. These numbers include workers who also earn tip income. Many of those earning less than the minimum wage work in restaurants and make more than the minimum wage after taking tips into account.
Minimum-wage earners fall into two distinct categories: young workers, usually in school, and older workers who have left school. Most minimum-wage earners fall into the first category; just over half are between the ages of 16 and 24. The rest are 25 or older.
Minimum-wage workers under 25 are typically not their family’s sole breadwinners. Rather, they tend to live in middle-class households that do not rely on their earnings. Generally, they have not finished their schooling and are working part-time jobs. Over three-fifths of them (62 percent) are currently enrolled in school. These workers represent the largest group that would benefit directly from a higher minimum wage, provided they kept or could find a job.
The characteristics of the teenagers and young adults who earn the minimum wage or less support the notion that these minimum-wage workers rarely work to support children and their families:
- 79 percent work part-time jobs.
- 62 percent are enrolled in school during non-summer months.
- Their average family income is $65,900 per year.
- Only 22 percent live at or below the poverty line, while 68 percent enjoy family incomes over 150 percent of the poverty line, which is $33,500 for a family of four.
- Most have not finished their education. A third have not yet finished high school, while almost a quarter have only a high school degree. Another two-fifths have taken college courses but have not yet graduated. Many of these are college students working part-time while in school. Only 3 percent have finished college and obtained a degree.
- Fully 60 percent are women.
- Only 5 percent are married.
Adults who earn the minimum wage are less likely to live in middle- and upper-income families than are the teenagers and young adults who earn the minimum wage. Nonetheless, three-fourths of older workers earning the minimum wage live above the poverty line. They have an average family income of $42,500 a year, well above the poverty line of $22,350 per year for a family of four. Most of them choose to work part-time, and a sizeable number are married.
The average older minimum-wage earner simply does not fit the stereotype of a worker living on the edge of destitution.
A few important characteristics of the 49.5 percent of minimum-wage earners who are over the age of 24 bear this out:
- Over half work part-time jobs.
- They have an average family income of $42,500 per year.
- Less than a quarter live in poverty, while 62 percent have incomes over 150 percent of the poverty line.
- They are better educated than younger minimum-wage workers but still have less education than the population as a whole: 22 percent have less than a high school education, 37 percent have only a high school diploma, and 29 percent have taken some college classes. However, only one in eight has a bachelor’s degree or more—far less than the 36 percent of all employees in that category.
- 67 percent are women.
- 41 percent are married.
Increased Minimum Wage Does Not Reduce Poverty
Many advocates of higher minimum wages argue that the minimum wage needs to rise to help low-income single parents attempting to survive on just a minimum-wage job. Minimum-wage workers, however, do not fit this stereotype. Just 4 percent of minimum-wage workers are single parents working full-time, compared to 5.6 percent of all U.S. workers. Minimum-wage earners are actually less likely to be single parents working full-time than is the average American worker.
Higher minimum wages do not address the main reason that most poor families live below the poverty line. Contrary to what many assume, low wages are not their primary problem, because most poor Americans do not work for the minimum wage. The problem is that most poor Americans do not work at all.
As the table demonstrates, two-thirds of individuals living below the poverty line did not work, and less than one in 10 worked full-time year-round. Families are poor not because they earn low wages but because they do not have full-time jobs. Raising the minimum wage does not address this problem.
Worse, making it more expensive to hire inexperienced workers leads businesses to hire fewer of them. This makes it harder for low-income families to gain the experience and skills necessary to rise out of poverty. This is one reason why studies consistently find that higher minimum wages do not reduce poverty rates.
Find Another Way to Help the Poor
Many support raising the minimum wage because they want to help low-income Americans get ahead, but minimum-wage earners are not much more likely to live in poverty than are most other Americans: Less than one in four live in a family with earnings below the poverty line. Two-thirds work part-time, and most are between 16 and 24 years old. Minimum-wage earners’ average family income exceeds $50,000 a year, and very few are single parents working full-time to support their families—fewer than in the population as a whole.
Most of the benefits from raising the minimum wage will go to families who are well above poverty. These benefits will come at the cost of reducing the availability of entry-level jobs. Employers respond to higher labor costs by hiring fewer workers. Higher minimum wages eliminate entry-level positions that provide unskilled employees the opportunity to gain experience. Less experience makes it harder for workers to become more productive and earn higher wages.
Unsurprisingly, researchers find that higher minimum wages do not reduce poverty. Congress should look for less ineffective ways to help the poor.
Truth…it’s a hard thing to swallow, but, it’s the truth. Raising the minimum wage will not help anyone.
Ron Paul vs. Paul Krugman
Wow, I was looking forward to this showdown for while now. Paul Krugman always manages to make my blood boil and he sure didn’t disappoint me here. His twisting of Milton Friedman’s economic policies are laughable at best and just proves what kind of slimy toad he is. People like Krugman love to over-complicate very simple principles that in turn end up screwing them up.
I’ve always applauded Ron Paul’s fiscal policies and theories and only wish he had stuck strongly with them during his Presidential bid rather than exploring his libertarian anti-war nonsense every chance he got.
This is a very good read about how you’re losing money even though you’re not taxed more thanks to our current economic policies.